Talk:Bloody Roar: End Zoan/@comment-26516813-20150705185845/@comment-26419622-20150706081701

It's partially personal choice, but the Leo I'm using is between seasons 1 and 2. I found this to be a good spot since he gets curb stomped at the end of season 2 (the in-story reason for the voice change was that the beating was so bad it caused injury to his voice box). He also is injured for a lot of season 3. Between seasons 1 and 2 seems like a good spot where he could still be out adventuring and not trying to save all of new york.

I won't go much into it, but Uriko and Uranus aren't the first... and perhaps not the last in a line of others.

As for name designations I do think the animal is better in most instances. I choose different designations for different reasons. It depends on the animal and if there are multiple animals of the same genus and/or species (i.e. Hans and Vulpez). Some get different designations if the animal has a nickname or other term (i.e. Michael). Some because the animal name is too cumbersome or doesn't strike me as cool (i.e. Dragana (if you look up Dragana's beast form the genus is named Ouroboros)). Some to add a certain air or first impression about a character (i.e. Bart). If I were to give everyone a mythological designation then I think it takes the impact away from other characters.

When you see names, like Yugo the Wolf, Long the Tiger, Gado the Lion etc. you already know they are dangerous but then you read a name like Bart the Kraken you sort of stop and wonder just what this person is about (which for Bart there is a reason. He's basically a sub boss and a difficult character to fight). It's abnormal when compared to others. If I use a mythological name for a designation then usually there is something different about that character. This was the same for other Bloody Roar games too (the Phoenix and the Chimera).