Talk:Salvation/@comment-3187795-20121229184717/@comment-1732218-20121230052719

Hmm, I never really thought about benefits. The only real effect that I had in mind that would happen is if Matthew was very nice, people would be more accepting of him and his help, while if Matthew was very evil, people would generally avoid/attack/heckle him. Now, if Matthew was neutral, people would be indifferent about him and approach with necessary caution (which makes sense in context).

I guess if it came down to benefits, I'd say that being very good offers more moral support (like, if Matthew was overwhelmed by Scions, anyone who was in the vicinity would come in to help) while being very bad offers you more greedy options, like having more powerful weapons and assets.